Article ETHIS
Blue Ocean vs Red Ocean, Which is Strategic?
Published on 19 Feb 2024
Admin Relations
In the competitive business world, strategy is the key to survival and growth. Two approaches that are often discussed are the Blue Ocean and Red Ocean strategies.
The Blue vs Red Ocean analogy in business describes market and industry competition. Red Ocean or red color indicates fierce to 'bloody' competition for revenue, market share dominance, and success between companies.
Whereas a Blue Ocean indicates calmness and clarity, no contamination of business competition, and minimal market share so that growth opportunities can be explored.
Let's dissect the two to understand which one is more strategic in winning the market.
Blue Ocean Strategy carries the concept of creating a new market, where a company operates in a space that is untapped by competitors. It involves product innovation, differentiation, and a focus on unmet customer needs.
Examples of Success
Apple's launch of the iPhone
When Apple entered the smartphone market with the iPhone in 2007, it changed the way we interact with technology.
By incorporating innovative features such as multi-touch touchscreens and intuitive interfaces, Apple managed to create a new market where none existed before.
They not only gained significant market share but also paved the way for a new generation of technology products.
Uber transformed the transport industry.
Red Ocean Strategy is a conventional approach where companies compete in an existing market. Fierce competition often results in a battle for a limited market share, with a focus on operational efficiency and cost reduction.
Examples of Success:
Walmart emphasises low prices
As one of the largest retailers in the world, Walmart is known for its highly efficient Red Ocean Strategy approach. By focusing on cost reduction and operational efficiency, Walmart can offer competitive prices to its customers.
With great scalability and excellence in the supply chain, they ensure that competition in the market remains within their control.
Coca-Cola survives in the soft drink market.
Blue Ocean: Emphasises innovation and product uniqueness.
Red Ocean: Focuses on efficiency and improving cost advantages.
Blue Ocean: Minimal direct competition.
Red Ocean: Fierce competition with existing competitors.
Blue Ocean: High innovation risk.
Red Ocean: High risk of competition.
There is a risk that the efforts made will not result in creating a blue ocean. The success of this strategy depends on the organization's resources, talents, and position in the market.
Balancing the organization's two strategic imperatives (cost reduction and buyer value) can take time and effort.
Organizational hurdles, such as resource scarcity and lack of strategic alignment, can affect the outcome of a blue ocean strategy.
Businesses must attract enough customers to generate economies of scale and deter direct competition.
Blue ocean markets will eventually become red oceans when competitors emerge.
Choosing between Blue Ocean and Red Ocean Strategy is not always a black-and-white choice. Most companies find value in combining elements of both strategies. For example, while companies may seek new space in the market with innovation (Blue Ocean), they also need to maintain cost advantages and operational efficiency (Red Ocean).
In a dynamic business era, the key to long-term success lies in a company's ability to adapt and innovate.
Blue Ocean Strategy offers opportunities to create new markets and change the rules of the game, while Red Ocean Strategy provides a solid foundation in fierce business battles.
By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each strategy, companies can develop a holistic plan to achieve sustainable competitive advantage.
Related Article
PT. ETHIS FINTEK INDONESIA
Rukan Puri Mansion block B no. 7 Outer Ring West Kembangan Street, RT.2/RW.1, South Kembangan, Kembangan District, Special Capital Region of Jakarta 11610
Customer Service: support@ethis.co.id
Operational Hours: 09.00 - 18.00 WIB
Notes:
1. Tech-based Islamic Financing service (P2P Financing) is a civil agreement between Funder and Beneficiary, in which all risks are charged to all parties.
2. Payment failure is charged to the Funder, except for fraud case and mismanagement. Beneficiaries are imposed if fraud and mismanagement happens as in Risk Sharing terms based on Islamic Principles. There is no national institution or authority that is responsible to financing risk or payment failure or compensating on any parties including loss, failures, fees or consequences after.
3. The platform with agreement from all respective users (funders and/or beneficiaries) accesses, gains, stores, manages and/or uses users’ personal data (Data Utilization) on or in the objects, electronic devices (including smartphones or cellular phones), hardwares or softwares, electronic documents, applications or electronic systems belong to Users or managed by Users, upon the information of aims, limitations and mechanism of Data Utilization to the Users before the approvals.
4. Funders with limited knowledge on this financing are suggested not to use this service.
5. Beneficiaries are obliged to consider return rates/margin/service fee and other fees according to the ability to repay the financing.
6. Each fraud is recorded electronically in cyberspace and easily recognized by public through social media.
7. Users should read and understand this information before deciding to be a Funder or Beneficiary.
8. Government as in this case is Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) / Financial Services Authority is not responsible for violation or disobedience of users, Funder and Beneficiary (intentionally or unintentionally) against terms and conditions or agreement or attachment between the platform and Funder and/or Beneficiary.
9. Each transaction and financing activities, funding, financing or enforcement agreement regarding financing between or involves the Platform, Funder, Field Partner and/or Beneficiary should happen through escrow account and virtual account as stated in OJK regulation No. 77/POJK.01/2016 about Tech-Based Financing Services.